An open letter about ESEO telemetry specifications

Dear Piero Galeone and Antonio de Luca,

As an Amateur Radio operator experienced in the field of Amateur satellites and in the space industry, I am publishing this open letter to motivate and request the release of the complete technical specifications for the telemetry that the ESEO satellite will transmit in the frequency 437.00MHz, in the 70cm Amateur satellite band.

According to the ITU Radio Regulations for the Amateur and Amateur-satellite Services, “Transmissions between amateur stations of different countries shall not be encoded for the purpose of obscuring their meaning, except for control signals exchanged between earth command stations and space stations in the amateur-satellite service.” A strict interpretation of this rule means that the specifications of all digital protocols used by Amateur stations should be publicly available, so that anyone is able decode the data. The use of protocols with undisclosed specifications can be seen as a try to obscure the meaning of the data.

Continuing with the ITU Radio Regulations, the definition of the Amateur service describes it as “a radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, by duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest.” In my opinion, the use of protocols with undisclosed specifications goes against the spirit of this definition, in particular, it can hinder technical investigations and self-training.

For these reasons, I am a strong proponent of requiring that all the protocols used by Amateur stations have publicly available specifications, allowing anyone to decode the data, study the protocols, learn, experiment and improve upon the state of the art. In view of the paragraphs cited above, publishing the full specifications so that anyone can build a complete decoder independently is both an obligation and the best practice.

This is especially important for Amateur satellites, which often use at least some form of ad-hoc protocols in their telemetry downlink. The public specifications for this telemetry downlink are often incomplete or inexistent. As an attempt to remedy this situation, I develop gr-satellites, which aims to decode every satellite that transmits in Amateur bands. Developing this tool usually requires some reverse engineering, due to the lack of documentation. Some similar tools by other Amateurs are the Soundmodem decoders by Andrey Kopanchuk UZ7HO and the Telemetry decoders by Mike Rupprecht DK3WN, who face similar challenges.

A large number of Amateur operators and enthusiasts throughout the world routinely use these tools to decode telemetry from Amateur satellites, contributing valuable data to the satellite operators through the SatNOGS network and other databases. Also, these tools can be an invaluable reference to educational or research institutions or companies that start building satellites.

Regarding the ESEO satellite, I believe that the educational and collaborative aims of the project is in line with the self-training and investigation aspects of the Amateur service. Thus, publishing complete specifications for the telemetry downlink seems the best practice to respect the goals of the project.

Additionally I think ESA should be held to the highest standards and be exemplary in publishing the specifications. This is specially important, since currently it is often hard to get documentation from the developers of many Amateur satellites.

While some documentation for ESEO has already been published, this is not enough to build a complete telemetry decoder. For instance, the equations needed to interpret the raw telemetry readings such as voltage, current and temperature are missing.

I hope that this letter serves to raise awareness about the need of publishing specifications for the protocols used in the Amateur service and that a complete set of documentation is published for ESEO, allowing Amateurs to build their own telemetry decoders.

Best regards,

Dr. Daniel Estévez, EA4GPZ.

Respuesta al artículo “¿Por qué asociarse?” por EA1URA

English summary: This is an opinion post discussing the reasons given by EA1URA to join URE, the National Amateur Radio Spanish society. My main point is that the services offered by the society do not justify the fees and that the society doesn’t properly represent the interests of Amateurs with a profile similar to mine.

Normalmente no escribo artículos de opinión ni tampoco escribo en español en este blog, pero en este caso he creído conveniente hacer una excepción. Recientemente, EA1URA (URE Asturias) publicaba un artículo titulado “¿Por qué asociarse?” en el que da una lista de razones por las que merece la pena asociarse a URE. Ayer, en Twitter, @ea1ura me pasaba directamente el enlace del artículo. Tras una breve lectura, yo contestaba que ninguno de los puntos que exponen me parecen económicamente interesantes para un Radioaficionado de mi perfil y que no consideraba que URE defendiera adecuadamente mis intereses.

En este post intento extender y justificar mi respuesta, con la esperanza de que quizás sirva como crítica constructiva. Durante el artículo incluiré algunas comparaciones con la situación en Reino Unido: la RSGB y su normativa. Esto es simplemente porque es el único país extranjero donde conozco bien la situación, al haber residido allí. En general, considero que la situación en Reino Unido está bastante mejor que en España y deberíamos intentar copiar algunas cosas de allí. Imagino que cualquiera que tenga un buen conocimiento de la situación en otros países europeos como Alemania u Holanda puede tener una impresión similar.

Continue reading “Respuesta al artículo “¿Por qué asociarse?” por EA1URA”